Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Seagull on sale pier.jpg

Reason: I was chastised for removing this from the article for a FPC nomination. However Fir removed it himself not much later. It doesn't meet current standards and isn't in the article.
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Seagull
Nominator: Noodle snacks (talk)

Delist — Noodle snacks (talk) 10:56, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nominator. Mostlyharmless (talk) 06:48, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. Kaldari (talk) 23:01, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delist Fine, fine, lets close this out. Really now, it's okay, and I shudder at removing something from Fir, considering his retirement, but I much prefer not having any delist candidates to have to look at. Nezzadar ☎ 14:05, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. Durova³³³ 03:54, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist upstate NYer 04:01, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. Fir's retirement was his own choice, and it doesn't mean his FPs are set in stone. Seagulls are one of the easiest and most accessible birds to photograph, and this one isn't one of the best ones anymore. Ðiliff «» (Talk) 10:15, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. Is actually a nice image, revealing the urban environmental footprint of these very common birds :-). The image still appears in two articles [1] Elekhh (talk) 13:57, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Lists don't really count as articles in terms of EV for FPs. In fact many lists get stripped of images because they add so very little. Ðiliff «» (Talk) 14:18, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Zoo Fari 16:15, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]