Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Kiwi (Actinidia chinensis) 2 Luc Viatour.jpg

Support reasons see above. —αἰτίας •discussion• 16:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused, you opposed a photo of the same exact kiwi due to color balance. How is this photo better? Cacophony (talk) 18:17, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - looks grainy around the edges sorry --Hadseys Chat_Contribs 18:23, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At "3664 × 2738 pixels" DinA3 printing is without grain! --Luc Viatour (talk) 12:23, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well sorry but I can see grain and for that reason I oppose --Hadseys Chat_Contribs 13:13, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Oppose it is grainy around the edges ~~and I would prefer if it had a transparent background.~~ Spencer^T♦^C 00:15, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Glare- needs a softer flash, and it's blurry :D\=< (talk) 02:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support Looks good, its a shot of a Kiwi fruit, how far are you people zooming in to find things to complain about?! Mfield (talk) 12:58, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This one, too, looks a bit washed-out and yellowish. An easy subject needs to be practically perfect in every way...--Janke | Talk 15:48, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Is that so? --Fir0002 23:50, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - A ";-)" was implied, but since you bring it up, the mustard "compilation shot" got my vote because of high enc. --Janke | Talk 09:10, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I thought I saw some graininess, but it just turned out to be the atoms of the fruit caught in mid-vibration. Yeah, I'd prefer a shot that showed more of the skin (i.e. probably a whole one beside the half one), but I'll support this until you get that shot... :-) Matt Deres (talk) 01:42, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I would say it would be more useful if you could see a view of a full fruit as well as the cross section, like we have on Image:Bright red tomato and cross section02.jpg. J Milburn (talk) 01:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 08:39, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]