Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Boy with a Basket of Fruit by Caravaggio.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2019 at 12:26:29 (UTC)

Reason: A caravaggio's masterpiece
Articles in which this image appears: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_Minniti
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Architas

Withdrawn – LivioAndronico ^(talk) 12:26, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for now. There's a different version in our article on the painting (with very different colours) and this one (which was uploaded by a blocked user) has questionable licensing/sourcing information. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:53, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The sockpuppetry concern is not a problem, the operator of the accounts is still in good standing on this wiki as the socks haven't been used to violate policy or stack en.wp FPC. See the comments with my admin hat on here. And surely the colors are more faithful than the print as you can see here [1] thanks --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:27, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose not used in article on the painting. And colours? Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:41, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But is it really so complicated to see that the white balance is wrong? Open photoshop or another program and see if the white balance is correct. It seems simple enough, plus it's a scanned and badly not a photo. Also you should be careful and see that the article I put is this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_Minniti. Maybe it's better to read first, thanks --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 09:33, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is not used in Boy with a Basket of Fruit. Maybe it's better to read my comment carefully! The article on one of the painter's young boyfriends is not as significant as the article of the painting itself. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:22, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

and in fact nobody has named this article, read well! where would I have nominated him? you are doing everything by yourself --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 17:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

White balance is better in this: [2], note the white sleeve, it is blue in this candidate! Janke | Talk 14:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because is blue! is the effect of the dark! --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 17:58, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the edits on the image page, it was originally white in your image, and you edited it to blue... --Janke | Talk 20:32, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you meant the other sleeve, you're actually right. This is actually incorrect but I cannot change it. Then retreat, even for the meaningless votes of others, thank you--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Residual moiré from scanning a printed reproduction. Hard to see, but it's there - do a few "Sharpen more" filters in Photoshop, and the moiré pops out clearly. Not so in the image in the article about the painting. Janke | Talk 14:42, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

honestly it is absurd for me .... but ok I understand --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request withdrawn --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:16, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]