Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Cuzco-Pano edit.jpg

Cuzco, Peru

Original - Cuzco, Peru viewed from south of the city near Cristo Blanco. Part of Sacsayhuamán is seen at far right and Plaza de Armas is toward the center of the image. Cuzco was the capital city of the ancient Inca empire.

Edit 1 by Fir0002

Reason: Worth a try.
Articles this image appears in: Cusco
Creator: User:Cacophony

Support as nominator Cacophony (talk) 08:10, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Edit 1. I would suggest improving the caption (which way are we facing, what are some notable landmarks visible in the panorama, etc.) Spikebrennan (talk) 17:42, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit 1. Looks very interesting. --KFP (talk | contribs) 18:33, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit 1. Great image .Bewareofdog (talk) 23:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support either. Great picture. Very well stitched, and none of it is washed out. We could use more like these! Clegs (talk) 04:43, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit 1 68.7.184.116 (talk) 18:29, 16 January 2008

~~(UTC)~~

IPs do not have suffrage, comment struck. If you wish to have your vote counted, please create an account. You also need to give a reason for your vote. You can say 'Support as per <voter's name>' to mean that you support for the same reason as another voter. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξ φ 19:57, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- - Umm, you can say "Support" - it implies "Support per nom" - you can't say "Oppose" alone though. de Bivort 03:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ummm, admin please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe IPs do get suffrage. And at any rate, it is considered bad Wikiquette to strikethrough other's comments. Clegs (talk) 01:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - IPs are generally ignored as a way to reduce the risk of sock puppeting, but their comments can certainly be considered when they are productive and contribute to a consensus. de Bivort 03:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - Yep, basically as Debivort says. To quote from the top of the page: "Note however that anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets." In other words the 'vote' would probably be ignored whether crossed through or not, although a valid opinion could certainly be observed; not that it's likely to make any difference here. --jjron (talk) 03:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit H92110 (talk) 12:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit1. Great photo showing not only Cuzco itself, but also population density. - Darwinek (talk) 13:32, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit1 I like the composition, colours, lighting. And as stated above, it also illustrates the dense population of Cusco. Chris.B 14:41, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Edit 1 Looks good to me. --Shark face 217 02:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:Cuzco-Pano edit.jpg --jjron (talk) 15:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]